<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Using Props in Teaching and Lecturing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://genealogyeducation.wordpress.com/2006/03/14/using-props-in-teaching-and-lecturing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://genealogyeducation.wordpress.com/2006/03/14/using-props-in-teaching-and-lecturing/</link>
	<description>for educators, event organizers and the curious</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 16:39:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sally Jacobs</title>
		<link>http://genealogyeducation.wordpress.com/2006/03/14/using-props-in-teaching-and-lecturing/#comment-175</link>
		<dc:creator>Sally Jacobs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 02:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://genealogyeducation.wordpress.com/2006/03/14/using-props-in-teaching-and-lecturing/#comment-175</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m an archivist who teaches workshops on how to properly care for photographs. My favorite prop is something I use to illustrate how fragile digital is as a storage medium...and how digital can fail totally, completely, catastrophically. I accidentally killed our external hard drive when I knocked it off a table. (It only had backup files on it, so I didn&#039;t lose anything but the money I spent to buy it.) During class I plug it in and turn it on. It makes a terrible noise that I hope students remember for a long, long time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m an archivist who teaches workshops on how to properly care for photographs. My favorite prop is something I use to illustrate how fragile digital is as a storage medium&#8230;and how digital can fail totally, completely, catastrophically. I accidentally killed our external hard drive when I knocked it off a table. (It only had backup files on it, so I didn&#8217;t lose anything but the money I spent to buy it.) During class I plug it in and turn it on. It makes a terrible noise that I hope students remember for a long, long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://genealogyeducation.wordpress.com/2006/03/14/using-props-in-teaching-and-lecturing/#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 23:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://genealogyeducation.wordpress.com/2006/03/14/using-props-in-teaching-and-lecturing/#comment-169</guid>
		<description>Some interesting thoughts here Ken. I teach psychology at University here in the UK, and I also do a bit of teaching new teachers how to teach. I think the important issue about props is that they act as a focus. They can point students to the areas and issues that we want them to concentrate on. Talk alone is only words. Words come and then they&#039;re gone. But a good prop, a good image is something that seems to shape ideas and somehow has a permanence in memory; as you said - giving a concrete representation of the abstract. The key to good &quot;propping&quot; (I think) is appropriateness. Today I see many colleagues embracing the all powerful PowerPoint presentation as a key feature in their teaching. And I&#039;ve got nothing against that, but I see many classes where getting a good set of interesting images together seems to be the target rather than shaping the learning experience of the students. I have been to a colleague&#039;s lecture recently which used almost 60 slides for a 45 minute talk, and most of the slides were at best tangential to the words, and seemed to tell a different story. Students spent most of the time trying to work out which of the competing narratives was more interesting, and failed to grasp the point of either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some interesting thoughts here Ken. I teach psychology at University here in the UK, and I also do a bit of teaching new teachers how to teach. I think the important issue about props is that they act as a focus. They can point students to the areas and issues that we want them to concentrate on. Talk alone is only words. Words come and then they&#8217;re gone. But a good prop, a good image is something that seems to shape ideas and somehow has a permanence in memory; as you said &#8211; giving a concrete representation of the abstract. The key to good &#8220;propping&#8221; (I think) is appropriateness. Today I see many colleagues embracing the all powerful PowerPoint presentation as a key feature in their teaching. And I&#8217;ve got nothing against that, but I see many classes where getting a good set of interesting images together seems to be the target rather than shaping the learning experience of the students. I have been to a colleague&#8217;s lecture recently which used almost 60 slides for a 45 minute talk, and most of the slides were at best tangential to the words, and seemed to tell a different story. Students spent most of the time trying to work out which of the competing narratives was more interesting, and failed to grasp the point of either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
